Crisis Communication in China: Why Saying Nothing Is the Worst Option

This article is part of a series analyzing Ziyu’s crisis communication strategy. [Read the introduction here.]

Ziyu is a Chinese actor and singer who rose to national fame in 2025 after starring in the hit web drama Revenged Love. During a recent controversy, he issued a first-person response—skipping the usual studio-drafted statement. He spoke in his own voice, took responsibility, named the issue, and showed emotion. In the context of crisis communication in China, this kind of direct, structured response is rare.
And it worked.

I won’t comment on the case itself.
But in a landscape where deletion and silence have become the default, someone who responds early—and takes structural responsibility—is worth examining from a communication point of view.

When brands face crisis in China, the issue often isn’t poor messaging.
It’s the absence of messaging.
Or a delayed statement that says nothing.
This isn’t a timing problem.
It’s a structural one.

This isn’t a gossip piece.
We’re here to break down structure:
Why do so many brands fail at crisis communication in China?
And what does effective expression actually look like?

1. Common Missteps in China’s Crisis Response

Not saying the wrong thing—just not saying anything at all

In China, many brands don’t respond to crisis.
They try to contain it.
Delete posts. Disable comments. Suppress visibility.
That’s the default.
It may seem effective short term, but it avoids the real issue: communication.

Here’s what usually goes wrong:

1. Delays
While internal teams are still aligning messaging, the narrative is already formed externally.
Platform logic moves by the hour, not by the day.

2. Statements without content
A lot of brands issue responses that look like they’re saying something—but offer nothing of value.
No accountability. No concrete action. Sometimes not even a subject.
Empty language doesn’t slow the backlash. It accelerates it.

3. “We take this seriously” as a substitute for action
It’s the most common PR filler.
It sounds bureaucratic.
Audiences don’t want to know how much you care.
They want to know what you’re doing.

4. No platform sensitivity
Weibo, WeChat, and Rednote operate under different linguistic and narrative expectations.
But many brands publish one statement across all channels—copied and pasted.
No adaptation. No rhythm. No regard for tone.
That’s not consistency. That’s failure.

In a crisis, silence isn’t neutral. It’s absence.
And when you’re absent, someone else will speak for you.

2. Why Communication Matters More Than You Think

Especially in the Chinese market

For many international brands, PR is about optics.
In the Chinese context, expression itself is a form of control.
What you say, how you say it, and where you say it—these define whether trust holds.

Here’s why:

1. Narratives fill themselves
If you don’t speak, others will.
Users piece it together. Platforms push what’s available.
Vacuum isn’t an option.

2. Silence is treated as default admission
In Chinese digital culture, silence is never neutral.
It suggests avoidance. Guilt. Evasion.
Say nothing, and you’ll be defined by others.

3. The timing window is narrow
Crisis moves fast.
You don’t have days.
Twelve hours without a response, and you’ve lost narrative control.
You’re not late—you’re irrelevant.

4. Users don’t expect perfection—just presence
Brands worry about saying the wrong thing.
But users aren’t looking for perfection.
They’re watching whether you show up, state your stance, and provide structure.
Right or wrong comes second.
Your presence is the first signal.

That said, not every crisis can be managed through expression alone.
Whether things turn around depends on the boundaries of the issue—and how much emotional cost the audience has absorbed.
PR manages communication. It doesn’t rewrite reality.
Communication is necessary—but not sufficient.

Final Notes

This isn’t a PR playbook.
It’s not about one case either.
But from the standpoint of content strategy, the way you respond often decides whether trust holds—or collapses.

In an environment where silence and deletion are standard,
someone choosing to speak—and owning the structure of their response—is doing something worth paying attention to.

The same applies to brands.
You don’t have to say everything.
But in the Chinese market, saying nothing is always the worst option.

← Back to All Articles

You May Also Like: